The Pitfalls of Using General AI in Software Development: A Case for a Human-Centric Approach

With the development of general artificial intelligence, it is now also taking its place in jobs that require intellectual knowledge and creativity. In the realm of software development, the idea of harnessing General AI's cognitive capabilities has gained considerable attention. The notion of software that can think, learn, and adapt like a human programmer sounds enticing, promising to streamline development processes and potentially revolutionize the industry. However, beneath the surface allure lies a significant challenge: the difficulty of modifying General AI-based systems once they are deployed.

General AI, also known as Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), embodies the concept of machines possessing human-like intelligence and adaptability. In the world of software development, it has the potential to automate a myriad of tasks, from coding to debugging. Nevertheless, as we delve into the promises and perils of incorporating General AI into the software development process, a series of critical concerns and challenges come to the forefront.

A Guide To Taming Blocking Operations With Project Reactor

In the world of modern web application development, responsiveness and scalability are paramount. Users expect lightning-fast responses and seamless interactions, and to meet these expectations, developers have embraced reactive programming paradigms. Spring WebFlux, with its non-blocking, asynchronous foundation, is a cornerstone of this revolution.

However, even in the realm of reactive programming, there are often unavoidable encounters with the blocking world. Whether it's interfacing with legacy systems, accessing a traditional database, or integrating with third-party libraries that haven't made the leap to reactive yet, developers find themselves at the crossroads of reactivity and blocking operations.

Logging Incoming Requests in Spring WebFlux

In the world of modern software development, meticulous monitoring and robust debugging are paramount. With the rise of reactive programming paradigms, Spring WebFlux has emerged as a powerful framework for building reactive, scalable, and highly performant applications. However, as complexity grows, so does the need for effective logging mechanisms. Enter the realm of logging input requests in Spring WebFlux — a practice that serves as a critical foundation for both diagnosing issues and ensuring application security.

Logging, often regarded as the unsung hero of software development, provides developers with invaluable insights into their applications' inner workings. Through comprehensive logs, developers can peer into the execution flow, troubleshoot errors, and track the journey of each request as it traverses through the intricate layers of their Spring WebFlux application. But logging is not a one-size-fits-all solution; it requires thoughtful configuration and strategic implementation to strike the balance between informative insights and performance overhead.

Real-Time Streaming ETL Using Apache Kafka, Kafka Connect, Debezium, and ksqlDB

As most of you already know, ETL stands for Extract-Transform-Load and is the process of moving data from one source system to another. First, we will clarify why we need to transfer data from one point to another; second, we will look at traditional approaches; finally, we will describe how one can build a real-time streaming ETL process using Apache Kafka, Kafka Connect, Debezium, and ksqlDB.

When we build our business applications, we design the data model considering the functional requirements of our application. We do not take account of any kind of operational or analytical reporting requirements. A data model for reporting requirements is to be denormalized, whereas the data model for operations of an application is to be mostly normalized. So, for reporting or any kind of analytical purposes, we are required to convert our data model into denormalized form.