The Power of Silence in Negotiation

Featured Imgs 23

Welcome to Creator Columns, where we bring expert HubSpot Creator voices to the Blogs that inspire and help you grow better.

A few months ago, on my podcast Nudge, Jonah Berger told me about the power of pausing.

Download Now: Negotiate Like a Pro [Free Guide]

The act of pausing seems like a small thing. But recent studies show that pausing can make you more persuasive and can improve outcomes.

In this blog, I'll share some of the science behind this phenomenon and how to apply it to your next negotiation.

Pausing shows confidence.

He shared how highly successful speakers often use a surprising amount of pauses when they talk.

Jonah shared this clip from an Obama speech and told me to listen for pauses. You can see the speech here:

That clip is just 45 seconds long, yet Obama pauses for one second or more eight times.

Jonah says this isn’t by accident. Obama has taught himself to slow down and pause more often. Why? Well, according to Jonah, it makes the former president sound more confident.

Jonah has conducted studies that prove this (cited in his book Magic Words).

He and his colleagues showed a group of participants a speech recording. 50% of the participants heard the presenter talk without pauses. The other 50% of participants listened to the exact same presentation but with pauses included.

The two different groups of participants were then asked what they thought of the speaker, how they rated the content, and how positively they felt about the talk.

Jonah Berger discovered that the pausing speaker received better scores across all different questions.

Remember, the content of the speech was identical — the tone, the style, the accent — it was all the same. The only difference between the two speeches was the pauses, and those pauses dramatically changed how the speech was perceived.

Pauses can be strategic.

Pausing won’t just help political candidates. It has helped one of the world’s greatest footballers, Lionel Messi.

Pausing is one counterintuitive thing Lionel Messi does that makes him great. Unlike his peers, Messi spends the first three minutes of a match doing nothing. He doesn’t sprint, tackle, or pass; he strolls around the pitch.

But why?

Power of silence in negotiation example: Messi video

Image Source

Adam Alter shared the reason while chatting with me on a recent episode of Nudge.

He explained that Messi struggled as a youngster. He was extremely anxious when he first set foot on the pitch. Often, he was physically sick as the game started and had to leave the field to recover. His anxiety made it impossible for Messi to play to the best of his ability.

Maradona famously said Messi would never succeed because he’s too anxious and too nervous.

It seemed like Messi was destined for a career of missed opportunities until one Barcelona youth coach gave him some advice.

He told him to pause at the start of the game, not feel pressure to run or tackle, and not start playing the game until minute three. Just amble around, take in your surroundings, watch the opponents, and calm yourself down.

Pausing worked. Rather than frantically starting the game like every other player, Messi took the time to settle his nerves. And this inaction became a surprising advantage.

Having time to pause gave Messi the space to analyze his opponents quickly. Is there a weakness in their set-up? Is there space somewhere in the defense? Usually, there is, and Messi, after settling his nerves, would have no trouble taking advantage of it.

The Power of Silence in Negotiation

Pausing has a strategic benefit for Lionel Messi and Barack Obama, helping both reach the top of their game.

But is it useful for the rest of us? Can we apply it if we don’t play professional football or deliver professional pitches?

Well yes. Evidence suggests it might be worthwhile to try this approach during your next negotiation.

In one study (cited in Anatomy of a Breakthrough), a team of psychologists studied the value of pauses during negotiations. Specifically, the researchers focused on wage negotiations. They hypothesized that pausing could persuade hiring managers to offer higher wages.

For the test, the researchers recruited 60 pairs of university students. Students were assigned one of two roles. Half were hiring managers, half were job candidates. All were given 45 minutes to negotiate over pay for the hypothetical jobs.

But here’s the twist. 50% of the job candidates were explicitly directed to pause during the negotiation.

So, half negotiated as normal, but the other half were forced to pause.

Power of silence in negotiation graphic on the power of pausing

The pausing worked. The job candidates who paused received a larger pay packet offer from the hiring manager.

Those who paused negotiated better deals (for both parties). According to Adam Alter:

“They inspired superior outcomes for both parties and encouraged negotiators to see that some issues could be negotiated to the benefit of both parties rather than competitively.”

It’s common to feel like Messi at the start of his career — anxious and sick with energy. In a negotiation, we feel a need to showcase our strength quickly and dismiss problems promptly, fueled by a rush of adrenaline that makes us speak louder, faster, and without pauses.

Yet studies in the lab find that this natural response has notable downsides. Those who energetically rattle off points will get worse negotiation outcomes than those who take their time.

Pausing might feel counterintuitive or wrong, but if it works for Barack Obama and Lionel Messi, it should work for you.

Embracing Imperfections in Marketing: How to Embrace Flaws Using the Pratfall Effect

Featured Imgs 23

Welcome to Creator Columns, where we bring expert HubSpot Creator voices to the Blogs that inspire and help you grow better.

Here’s something difficult for a marketer to admit.

Sometimes, marketing is incredibly glib.

→ Click here to download our free guide to digital marketing fundamentals  [Download Now].

It’s so intensely focused on highlighting positives that marketing often comes across as superficial. Advertising campaigns, slogans, and product launches all use the same rhetoric.

They talk about how great the thing is.

Gillette is the best a man can get. Coca-Cola Opens Happiness. And KFC is Finger Lickin’ Good.

Embracing imperfections in marketing example: KFC advertisement

Image Source

I’m not surprised.

If you want to persuade someone to buy something, you’ll probably talk about how great it is.

If you wanted to hook your roommate up with a work colleague, you wouldn’t tell them that they put tuna in the office microwave. No, you’d focus on the positives.

It’s conventional wisdom.

But is it right?

See, I think all of us, deep down, know that we’re not solely drawn to positive things.

No. Sometimes, we prefer imperfections.

Embracing imperfections in marketing is about buyer psychology.

If you told McDonald’s to change their slogan from I’m lovin’ it, to, I’ve only got $4 so this will have to do — you’d get kicked out of the boardroom.

Embracing imperfections in marketing example: McDonald’s example vs. idea

But this is a problem. It’s marketing that’s based on gut instinct, not evidence.

It's marketing based on opinion, not fact.

It's marketing based on experience, not science.

See if we focused on understanding the psychology behind our buyers, we might not laugh at this suggestion for a new McDonald's slogan. We might embrace it.

Perfection isn’t perfect.

Adam Grant shared a study of world-class sculptors in his book Hidden Potential.

It turns out that world-class sculptors weren’t world-class students. They showed little talent as they studied and definitely weren’t perfect. Their pieces contained lots of faults.

66% of the world’s best sculptors graduated high school with Bs and Cs.

Embracing imperfections in marketing example: Pratfall effect graphic

A similar pattern emerged when comparing America's most influential architects.

The great architects had rarely been great students: they typically finished college with a B or C average.

Adam Grant writes how, in their quest for flawless results, research suggests that perfectionists tend to get three things wrong.

  1. They obsess about details that don't matter.
  2. They avoid unfamiliar situations that might lead to failure.
  3. They berate themselves for making mistakes.

There’s something powerful in embracing flaws. Acknowledging that perfection is impossible and instead showcasing the imperfections that make you, you.

And the same is true for marketers. Those who embrace their flaws tend to create better ads.

The Pratfall Effect

Embracing imperfections in marketing example: Nudge brand graphic

This is known in psychology as the pratfall effect.

The pratfall effect was documented back in 1966 by the Havard psychologist Elliot Aronson. His studies revealed that people saw intelligent quiz contestants as more likable when they spilled coffee down themselves. In other words, competent people are preferred if they’re a little clumsy.

In Aronson’s words, “the pratfall effect made the quiz contestant appear more appealing, increasing his approachability and making him seem more human”.

Jo Sylvester conducted a followup study at Swansea University. Her team found that when job candidates revealed a weakness they were considered more likable, and thus were far more likely to be offered the job.

The Pratfall Effect in Practice

Consumer psychologist Adam Ferrier, a previous guest on Nudge, proved this by asking a representative sample of 626 people a question about cookies.

The participants were shown two cookies that were identical apart from one small difference. One cookie had a rough edge, while the other was perfectly smooth.

Embracing imperfections in marketing example: Nudge Pratfall effect graphic

But, I’m never convinced until I’ve tested these principles myself. So, I created two Reddit ads to promote my podcast, Nudge.

A Pratfall Effect Marketing Experiment

The first ad was traditional textbook marketing stuff, highlighting all the positives about listening to my show. It was titled “5 reasons why you should listen to Nudge.”

The second highlighted my flaws. Titled “5 reasons why you SHOULDN’T listen to Nudge.”

I’ll be honest. I didn’t expect the pratfall effect ad to work. It was too literal. I was literally telling people not to listen to my show AND giving them reasons why.

Sure, the reasons I gave weren’t too damning and it was all written in a jokey manner, but I still didn’t think it would beat the control.

I spent around $110 in total. Over 300,000 people saw the ad. And I couldn't believe the results.

Embracing imperfections in marketing example: Nudge Pratfall effect experiment graphic

It was 4x more effective.

The click-through rate on the control was 0.09%, but the click rate for the pratfall ad was 0.47%. I got a 391% uplift telling people not to listen to my show. Over 500 new listeners tuned in to the show from that one ad. And to date, it’s my most successful test on Reddit.

And yet, this is something that I doubt I’d ever use in a business setting. Your boss wouldn’t dare let you try something that says not to buy the product. It’s so rare to see companies embracing imperfections in marketing, or showcasing weaknesses, because it seems too risky.

But it pays to be different.

It pays to apply science to marketing.

And it pays to embrace your flaws.